Digital Media and online shopping

TechCrunch’s new contributing author after Marshall Kirkpatrick’s exit, Natali Del Conte says: When customers buy “Superman Returns” at Wal-Mart, they can choose to pay $1.97 more to play it on portable devices, $2.97 more to play it on PCs or laptops, or $3.97 more to play it on either portable devices or PCs/laptops.”

While this offer may interest the casual customers of WallMart (who seem to account for 40 percent of all DVD sales in the United States according to the CNN release), I do wonder if it addresses the actual target shopper for the online digital movie download.

Thord Hedengren at BlogHerald was irked enough
to post about what he feels would be ideal in the online shopping scenario for DVD movies, instead of them joining the PlaysForSure brigade.

Thord says: “Wal-Mart folks, how about this: Sell the DVD, offer an additional downloads package with every bloody format known to man for $2 extra, and don’t be asshats about the licensing. Let me play my movie where I want, with easily accessible downloads if I want it for my new media player, and you’ll have one happy and returning customer. It’s boring to re-encode movies in new formats, better if I can throw you some change and save the time.”

I think some of these ideas are quite profound. It’s time that digital movie download vendors wake up, smell the coffee and realize that their first target audience really is…

…the Geek.

The Geek with little or no time, or even the patience to find the right DVD cloning/copying clone and use it.

I posit that the geeks among us would be quite willing to let go of miniscule amounts of cash to forego the pain associated with acquiring that movie that they want to collect, archive it and keep transcoding it repeatedly to watch it on their owned devices. These devices usually require video to be in a specific format that is native to them to be able to play it.

YouTube has emphatically proven that transcoding video on-the-server is a better idea than leaving it up to the end-consumer. Let’s take this theme forward and try to reach the devices, directly instead of the current Web2.0 wave of only converting it to the (now universally playable) Flash video format (FLV). Like Thord ideates, offering a point blank whatever-format-you-want-it-in option seems much more ideal than the gradiented repeated value-increase model that WallMart is currently pitching.

At least to a geek like me.

I own and regularly drain the battery of my PSP by normal usage. I do play games on it (Racing away in Burnout Legends is my idea of a healthy break) but primarily I use it for, listening to podcasts, reading RSS through my specially formatted RSS aggregator, and yes watching video. I’d love to see some online support for this device’s video capabilities which IMnsHO leaves the other players in the dust with it’s hardware capabilities.


One thought on “Digital Media and online shopping”

  1. MYSELF SHAILESH, I WISH TO INFORM YOU ALL THAT, THE TV SHOW OF INDIAN TELEVISON (BID2WIN) IS A BIG FRAUD, I WANT TO  SHARE THAT I HAVE BIDS (APPROX. 491) IN THESE SHOW ON THROUGH INTERNET FORMAT VIA CREDIT PURCHESED BY PAYPAL. FOR THE BIDDING PRODUCT OF SONY ERICSSON MODEL P990I WORTH RS. 35000/-RS.(23rd jan 2007) AND WHERE MY BID WAS LOWEST AND UNIQUE ON MY AND BID2WIN RECORDS.  BUT  THEY ARE ANNOUNCED  TO ANOTHER WINNER  FROM  M.P  INDIA  AS PER HIS BID 15.20 RS. HOW IS POSSIBLE? SO I CONTECT TO BID2WIN CUSTOMER CARE AND TELL HIM FOR CLEARIFICATION, THEY ARE REPLY ME ONE AND ONLY ONE TIME THAT, WE DO INVESTIGATE AND CONTECT YOU REVERT BACK , TILL DATE NOW 29TH JAN,2007 NOT REPLY / CLEARFICATION FROM HIM……………………………………….???????/
    SO I’M WORRIED AND SHOCKED FOR THESE, ANY BODY CAN HELP ME ………….I HAVE ALL PROOF REGARDS
    I WANT TO TAKE A LEGAL ACTION ………………

    SHAILESH RATHOD
    [email protected]

Comments are closed.